Tuesday, December 23, 2008

ARE THEY MARTYRS?

ARE THEY MARTYRS?

For the first time in my life, I have come across the word `Martyr’, in audio-visual forms used for those killed during the Jihadi firing in Mumbai. Since childhood when words came into my knowledge, I have known the word Shaheed used for many leaders of the movement of Indian Independence and thereafter the soldiers killed in the conflicts with China- Pakistan. Therefore the word Martyr came to be acknowledged as the English translation of Shaheed in my conscious as those armed security personnel who while leading the nation in the war with enemy loose their lives.

There have been countless killings in our country since long at the hands of the people called terrorists, but never the words Martyr or Shaheed were discussed for the massacred persons. Mumbai terrorist violence has also been not the first Jihadi attack. Only in Mumbai, more than 200 people were killed just 2 years back in serial bomb blasts. Never in the past the people killed in terrorist violence were labeled Martyrs, therefore the word `Martyr’ used again and again perturbed me and forced me to scan the word and its meaning to access the justification of its usage.

Before sharing my search of these words, let me remind you that the one person who is being labeled as the greatest and bravest Martyr  is none else than Hemant Karkare, the ATS chief who came into prominence because of the Implication of some Hindu figures in the Malegaon Blasts investigation by the ATS. This may be his greatness to have alleged Hindu Terrorism with some untenable evidence, but what else great goes to his credit is not known to common Indians like me. As for his killing- He was killed in the indiscriminate firing along with his colleagues before they could retaliate. He was wearing the bullet proof jacket, even then he and others were killed, describes the intensity if firing. He died on his duty also does not make any difference between the others killed by the Jehadis, who were also at work according to their profile.

I hope you get my point. Now let’s discuss Martyr.

Martyr is a person who voluntarily suffers death rather than deny his or her religion.

Readiness for martyrdom was a collective ideal in ancient Judaism, notably in the era of the Maccabees, and its importance has continued into modern times. Roman Catholicism sees the suffering of martyrs as a test of their faith. Many saints of the early church underwent martyrdom during the persecutions of the Roman emperors. Martyrs need not perform miracles to be canonized. In Islam, martyrs are thought to comprise two groups of the faithful: those killed in jihad and those killed unjustly. In Buddhism, a bodhisattva is regarded as a martyr because he voluntarily postpones enlightenment to alleviate the suffering of others.

Martyr (Britannica Concise Encyclopedia)

1mar·tyr \'mär-tər\ n [ME, fr. OE, fr. LL, fr. Gk martyr-, martys witness] (bef. 12c)
1 : a person who voluntarily suffers death as the penalty of witnessing to and refusing to renounce a religion
2 : a person who sacrifices something of great value and esp. life itself for the sake of principle

1 : to put to death for adhering to a belief, faith, or profession
2 : to inflict agonizing pain on : torture

 

 

The term martyr (Greek μάρτυς martys "witness") is most commonly used today to describe an individual who sacrifices his or her life (or personal freedom) in order to further a cause or belief for many. Long ago, it initially signified a witness in the forensic sense, a person called to bear witness in legal proceedings. With this meaning it was used in the secular sphere as well as in both the Old Testamentand the New Testament of the Bible. The process of bearing witness was not intended to lead to the death of the witness, although it is known from ancient writers (e.g. Josephus) that witnesses, especially of the lower classes, were tortured routinely before being interrogated as a means of forcing them to disclose the truth. During the early Christian centuries the term acquired the extended meaning of a believer who is called to witness for his or her religious belief and on account of this witness endures suffering and death. In the English language, the term is a loanword, and often used with the extended meaning of someone who has been killed for his religious belief. The death of a martyr or the value attributed to it is called martyrdom.

In the context of church history, from the time of the persecution of early Christians in the Roman Empire, being a martyr indicates a person who is killed for maintaining his or her religious belief, knowing that this will almost certainly result in imminent death (though without intentionally seeking death). Christian martyrs sometimes declined to defend themselves at all, in what they see as a reflection of Jesus' willing sacrifice. However, the definition of martyrdom is not specifically restricted to the Christian faith.Usage of "martyr" is also common among Arab Christians (i.e. anyone killed in relation to Christianity or a Christian community, indicating that the English word "martyr" may not actually be a proper equivalent of its commonly ascribed Arabic translation.

PLEASE CORRELATETHE ABOVE DESCRIPTION WITH MUMBAI KILLINGS.

AND SHAHEED

In Arabic, a martyr is termed "shaheed" (literally, "witness"). The concept of the shaheed  is discussed in the Hadith, the sayings of Muhammad; the term does not appear in the Qur'an in the technical sense, but the later exegetical tradition has read it to mean martyr in the few passages that it does appear in. The first martyr in Islam was the old woman Sumayyah bint Khabbab, the first Muslim to die at the hands of the polytheists of Mecca (specifically, Abu Jahl). A famous person widely regarded as a martyr - indeed, an archetypal martyr for the Shia - is Husayn bin Ali, who died at the hands of the forces of the second Umayyad caliph Yazid I at Karbala. The Shia commemorate this event each year at Aashurah.

Muslims who die in a legitimate jihad bis saif (struggle with the sword, or Islamic holy war) are considered shaheed. This usage became controversial due to the Islamic strictures against suicide in the late 20th century when it was sometimes applied to suicide bombers by various groups. There is much controversy about the meaning of jihad in Islam, since Muhammad never claimed that suicide is equal to jihad; Jihad is an act of fighting for the Dar al Islam, either to defend it against an aggressor or to bring about its expansion. Muhammad(alahi salam) explained, in hadith (sayings or reports about or by Muhammad), that those who commit suicide are forbidden to even smell heaven. Many contend that suicidal murders are contrary to the spirit of Islam, and are not justifiable because as the Qu'ran forbids such acts. One hadith narrated by Abu Bakr "To fight against the infidels is Jihad; but to fight against your evil self is greater Jihad" is explicit evidence, of the Western worlds misunderstanding of the concept of jihad.

According to Richard Bulliet, professor of history at Columbia University, mass murder committed in the name of Islam, such at the September 11 attacks or the November 2008 Mumbai attacks “is not incompatible with the notion of martyrdom," in Islam.

Martyr seems essentially a Christian term and Shaheed- Islamic. India tradition and culture has no such thought and thus no words. The words in Indian languages and literature are बलिदान, वीरगति, त्याग, निधन etc., which are nowhere near Martyr or Shaheed.

So should they be called Martyrs? Rather I am sure that the Jihadis who braved the killing of about 200 kafirs are SHAHEED.

Dr. Jai Prakash Gupta. Ambala.

+91-9315510425

 

 

 

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Pratibha Patil - Questionable Candidate
Like Caesar’s Wife
Here’s why this banner needs to go up. And here’s where you can get this banner from.
Update:
An excellent editorial in Business Standard
Little would Pratibha Patil have thought when she was suddenly nominated as the UPA candidate to become the President of India that those who would wear the crown first have to make sure that there are no skeletons rattling around in their cupboards. Two have already tumbled out of hers, and who knows how many more will pop out in the next few days! One expects Heads of State of this country to, at the very least, have wiped their traces clean. Indeed, if the 1990s was permissive, this decade has been positively licentious. The Government of the Clean—with those uplifting symbols of purity, sacrifice and virtue, Sonia Gandhi, Manmohan Singh and, of course, the Yudhishtir-like Left—has forgotten the meaning of the simpler requirements of governance, such as moral authority, propriety, dharma and the like. So deaf is its conscience and so mute its inner voice that it wants to foist a person with a rather spotty reputation as President. But it is not too late even now. Perhaps Mrs Patil could and should save her patrons further embarrassment. After all, she too may have an inner voice urging her to renounce such worldly things as being the President of India. [Business Standard]



32 Responses to “Pratibha Patil - Questionable Candidate”
[…] saying no: The Acorn Offstumped Barbar Indian Atanu Amit Varma This entry was written by Sandeep and posted […][Seriously Sandeep » Just Say No on June 27th, 2007 at 16:03 ]
Can you make something out of this headline? On the outside it says “Prez poll:NDA to move EC against Congress” but the article is about Natwar..[Sriram on June 27th, 2007 at 16:52 ]
[…] (The banner comes from here. I saw it first here.) […][A criminal politician may be India’s next President « Atlantean Thoughts on June 27th, 2007 at 21:23 ]
[…] the face of silence from our Indian media, Nitin asks us to put up the above banner if you wish to protest against Patil’s candidature. I am not […][Pratibha Patil is not my President on June 27th, 2007 at 22:12 ]
[…] the face of silence from our Indian media, Nitin asks us to put up the above banner if you wish to protest against Patil’s candidature. I am not […][Pratibha Patil is not my President on June 27th, 2007 at 22:12 ]
Instead, they could have nominated Laloo Prasad - at least he can entertain and supply dairy products for all official functions.
Or, Rakhi Sawant - at least she calls them like she sees them; not to mention, she would be better than Ms.Patil for the stature of Indian Presidency.
Or, Silvio Berlusconi - he is not doing much these days, except fighting those pesky corruption charges; Sonia could finally have someone she could trust, and knowing silivio’s proclivities, someone she could “play” with; lest one of you uber nationalists pooh pooh, don’t forget that, I -nd- IA is not too far removed from I- tal-IA.
p.s. if we behave ourselves and pray really, really hard to Sonia Mata - maybe, just maybe, she and silvio will finally bestow upon our benighted nation a pure bred gora, who one day, will lead us all from darkness into the light.[Anuj on June 28th, 2007 at 01:06 ]
[…] Surprisingly, the media is quiet on this. However let the blogosphere resound. India’s most astute political blogger Nitin Pai is on the money on this, as is nearly always the case. Check out why he cannot respect Pratibha Patil.3 […][Not My President on June 28th, 2007 at 04:05 ]
Pratibha is not my President TOO,neither my kids nor any one who has some pride left.
Our heads will hang in shame if she becomes one.
ManMohan,Pratibha and Naveen Chawala as cec in 2009,and Sonia, need not make another sacrifice!
Deeply offended by the Stooge team.
Say NO TO ALL.
PI.[Prudent Indian on June 28th, 2007 at 15:36 ]
PRATIBHA PATIL – THE PRESIDENT
Shrimati Indira Gandhi was the first Women Prime Minister of India, but she behaved like as if she was the Iron man of India. The victory in 1971 Pakistan war was a historic moment in her life. She had taken our country to a global level. She had also made a huge contribution in Nuclear Power, as a result of which we are also a Nuclear Power in the world.
Shrimati Sonia Gandhi sacrificed the post of Prime Minister and set a huge example of her love towards our country. She also looks and behaves very similar to Indira Gandhi. When I see her on television I think that as if Shrimati Indira Gandhi is standing in front of me. She had made an historic decision by nominating Shrimati Pratibha Patil for the post of President of India. Although our country is Male Dominated she had set her mark by getting nominated for the post of President and this proves that Women in India are now a strong force to deal with.
After Sixty years of Independence a Woman leader is going to become the President of our country which is a beginning of a Revolution. Since she had born in Maharashtra which is the birth place of Shivaji and she got married in Rajasthan which is the birth place of Maharanapratap. Therefore she possesses all the qualities of these leaders and she is taking their pride to Delhi.
Shrimati Pratibha Patil had born on 19th December 1934 in Jalgaon. She is a Taurean and her Nakshatra is Rohini. From Moon to fifth house Mars is situated which shows that she is very intelligent. Since Ketu is situated in her third house she is very daring in taking decisions. This can be seen from the fact that after marriage she refused to keep the surname of her husband and kept her own surname ‘Patil’ which was a very big thing in that time. In today’s world women can inspire from Shrimati Pratibha Patil and make their own identity after marriage also.
Saturn is situated in her tenth house which is providing her success in every walk of life. Coincidentally her Nineth and Tenth house lord is also Saturn. According to Parashar rule it is a very big Rajyog and hence she can definitely become the President of India.
In the coming time it is very necessary for us to wake the Women Power in our country to save our country from Terrorism and other Illegal Activities.With God’s grace we have to get rid of all the Devil power which is stopping our country to become the most powerful nation of the world. During the Pakistan war Shrimati Indira Gandhi had made an historic moment. Since 1971 war nobody has created an impact like Indiraji as she had done in her time. Prime Minister like Atal Bihari Vajpayee was also not able to cross the border line of Pakistan at the time of Kargil War. As a result of which we had to face a very serious loss. If we would had Indira Gandhi at that time instead of Atal Bihari Vajpayee we would had cross their border and given them a beating of a life time.
Lately, but Sonia Gandhi has awakened the Women Power in India. In the coming future 33% Women reservation bill have to be pass and this will happen in the present Loksabha till 2008. Our country is going through a revolution of Women Power and we will soon be observing an era which is totally Women Dominated. Now the time has come in which Women should be equally respected like Men, because according to my calculation Women are the future of our Country.
Shrimati Sonia Gandhiji you should move forward towards development of our country because the whole nation is with you. Although you come from a Royal family you behave like a common woman. Looking at the stars of Pratibha Patil she is definitely going to become the President of our country Shrimati Sonia gandhiji has done a very good job by nominating her name for the post of President and it will be very beneficial for our country.“JAI JAWAN, JAI KISAN, JAI MAJDUR, AUR JAI NARI SHAKTI”.
- Pt. Shyam SharmaCell: 9833847174[Shyam Sharma on June 28th, 2007 at 16:53 ]
Panditji,
If you can predict such a bright future without taking any dakshina, I wonder how bright a future you can predict for dakshina-giving clients. Thanks for leaving your cell number though, so that we can all benefit from your gyan.[EVR on June 28th, 2007 at 17:54 ]
From your earlier post Nitin, “Instead of making this point, The Indian Express has found it expedient to put a gloss of “candidates’ history is no longer beyond public scrutiny” over the issue.” How I wish this was the case when Subramanian Swamy was exposing Ma Sonia.[Sriram on June 28th, 2007 at 17:54 ]
Shrimati Sonia Gandhiji you should move forward towards development of our country because the whole nation is with you. Although you come from a Royal family you behave like a common woman.
Did you figure that yourself Panditji?[Sriram on June 28th, 2007 at 18:10 ]
Sriram,
The ‘Express seems to have come around a bit more strongly today. Although it’s passing the buck to the Left—challenging it to put its vote where its mouth is (was?)[Nitin on June 28th, 2007 at 18:12 ]
“Since she had born in Maharashtra which is the birth place of Shivaji and she got married in Rajasthan which is the birth place of Maharanapratap. __Therefore she possesses all the qualities of these leaders__”
This is what I call refined entertainment! - It has logic and it has comedy !![Bala on June 28th, 2007 at 18:24 ]
Panditji, you crack me up!
Seriously, parodies of this caliber are rare as hen’s teeth. Your parody of the stupidity of the politicians raises mockery to sublime heights. I bow low in front of such mastery as you display above.[Atanu Dey on June 28th, 2007 at 18:33 ]
“Since she had born in Maharashtra which is the birth place of Shivaji and she got married in Rajasthan which is the birth place of Maharanapratap. Therefore she possesses all the qualities of these leaders and she is taking their pride to Delhi.”
Panditji, I bet you were born in Bihar?[Anuj on June 28th, 2007 at 20:30 ]
Panditji, you ROCK! Keep up the good work. Are you related to Baghdad Bob?[libertarian on June 28th, 2007 at 21:22 ]
Panditji,
I have some bad news for you. Mrs Pratibha Patil herself has alluded to the fact that astrological calculations have to be updated to account for the fact that there are 12 planets. I’m sure you will agree that she is a Forward Looking Woman to suggest that the Ancient Science needs to take into account New Facts. We look forward to the results of your new calculations.[Nitin on June 28th, 2007 at 22:29 ]
“Since 1971 war nobody has created an impact like Indiraji as she had done in her time. Prime Minister like Atal Bihari Vajpayee was also not able to cross the border line of Pakistan at the time of Kargil War. As a result of which we had to face a very serious loss. If we would had Indira Gandhi at that time instead of Atal Bihari Vajpayee we would had cross their border and given them a beating of a life time.”
Panditji, whatever else you say, I agree with you on this part especially “giving them a beating of a life time”
Also, whatever the stars and blogs say, you’re right when you say the utterly corrupt Srimati Pratibha will be the next president of our country because Sonia graha is in her first house (as Shivraj and Manmohan have proved repeatedly, Srimati Sonia is the most powerful of all grahas in our shrusti). Rajyogini indeed. Both these Srimatis are such inspiration to Srimatis everywhere.[Chandra on June 28th, 2007 at 23:04 ]
I will convey your sincere regards and concerns to Srimati Prathiba Patil during our next teleconference videoconference telepathic-conference psychic meeting/miscellaneous out-of-body-experience.
*** disappears ***[Dada Lekhraj Brahma Kumari wala on June 28th, 2007 at 23:57 ]
That cell number doesn’t work. I’ve been trying it for hours [Ghost of TTG on June 29th, 2007 at 00:05 ]
Panditji,Please give your address and telephone no ?I want to meet you in person…. are you married, by any chance ?I love you panditji…..[WTF on June 29th, 2007 at 05:53 ]
This pandit guy rocks. I’m still not able to decipher whether he was serious or was writing the most biting satire. Kudos to you pandit jee.. Please explain what were your motives while writing such a fantastic comment.[Himanshu Gupta on June 29th, 2007 at 12:15 ]
Chandra: Panditji, whatever else you say, I agree with you on this part especially “giving them a beating of a life time”.
Would be fine if Indira stopped with beating the life out of the Pakistanis. But when she was done with them she didn’t spare Indians either [libertarian on June 29th, 2007 at 13:44 ]
Congress is not going to back out, whatever people’s opinions might be. But Left can be put in a difficult situation if the issues are projected accordingly. For ex, that her firm swindled 17 crores will not worry the Left, but if it can be shown that it hurt a 100 labourers in the process, then Left will not be silent. Similarly in the case of the cooperative bank, the issue should be projected in terms of how poor women were denied their rightful loans while Pratibha’s kith and kin enjoyed crores of loans. That would probably draw Left’s attention. Basically project her in ways that Left has to disapprove of. A few stories of labourers who were wronged by her sugar factory and their current plight etc would give added benefits.[Sabarish Sasidharan on June 29th, 2007 at 23:20 ]
“Panditji, I bet you were born in Bihar?”
Anuj, WTF?[Chandan on June 30th, 2007 at 07:06 ]
Respected Lekhrajgi,
I have always faced disappointment in my life, but since year 2000 my life has been changed drastically and i realized the power of Truth and Lord Shiva. Because in the year 2000 i had gone to Brahmakumari center of Malad for 1 month.
People think that i am Insane, but i am very much confident that sooner or later Lord Shiva is going to born as a Avtaar in our country and according to me that time has come.
I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for sending my message to Shrimati Pratibha Patil. I sincerely want to meet you in person.
Waiting for your reply.
Regards,
Pt. Shyam Sharma[Shyam Sharma on July 7th, 2007 at 14:00 ]
I am rather amused, as to how she was ready for the job as it is a thankless,priceless
job.She won’t be able to rake in lots of mullah from this job. Seems her dead “Bhoot dadaji”
wants her to spread the “*#!kumari” cult between indian children, as thoese are the people
which the “President” caters too.Hmmm..nice candidate[sachin on July 9th, 2007 at 17:26 ]
It will be proved very very funny thing for india[Arbind kumar on July 11th, 2007 at 02:05 ]
sare ke sare congreshi beiman phir bhi congreshi bole mera bharat mahan. very fuuny[mallik on July 11th, 2007 at 02:11 ]
Agar pratibha patil agar President banti hai to India ke liye thik nahi hogee yesha mai sochati hu kyo ki president ke liye kuch positive quality hona chahiye na ki demerit[Anita kumari singh on July 11th, 2007 at 02:20 ]
This is a big SPIN!.First woman to be the President of India. Congress had earlier opposed the candidature of Ms. Laxmi Sehgal, who was not involved in any scam like Pratibha’s. Just for a woman, could you vote for Phoolan Devi or Rabri ? Congress does not have the answer. They are defending an unclean compromise candidate for the highest position.And for communists, you never expect any patriotic policy from them.[Raj on July 11th, 2007 at 18:35 ]